Mr. Fox pushed back… one week

Fox has moved the release date of Fantastic Mr. Fox from November 6 to November 13, 2009, according to Box Office Mojo.

According to Cinematical, the move might be to give the film some financial room:

According to Box Office Mojo, the studio has moved The Tooth Fairy back from November 13th to next January (because where else are you going to stick a Dwayne-Johnson-as-hockey-player-as-tooth-fairy outing?), and Wes Anderson’s The Fantastic Mr. Fox has moved back a week from 11/6 to 11/13 as their choice contender for the family dollar. This now places it right after Disney and Robert Zemeckis’ A Christmas Carol (really, the first week of November?) and just before Warners’ Cats & Dogs sequel (really, the second movie of Cats & Dogs?).

I’m not sure how much Johnson’s recent Race to Witch Mountain cost, but I can’t help but think that he’d like to outperform that film’s good-not-great $60-ish million gross, and January could be just the grounds to do that in. (Paul Blart: Mall Cop opened within a week of the proposed new date and has raked in… almost $144 million? Yep, over $140 million.) Mr. Fox, on the other hand, is a mainstream proving ground for the ever-quirky Anderson, and with a voice cast that includes George Clooney, Cate Blanchett, Jason Schwartzman, Bill Murray, and Anjelica Huston, let’s hope it has reason to top the $28 million gross of that last animated adaptation of a Roald Dahl book, 1996’s James and the Giant Peach.

Adapted from Loraxaeon’s Yankee Racers post.

Waris on Sartorialist

Perhaps the most respected male fashion bloggeur, Scott Schuman (aka The Sartorialist), has stopped Frequent [Wes] Collaborator, and dedicated turban wearer,Waris Ahluwalia for a photo in New York — Fifth Ave., to be precise. In addition to his website, Schuman also has his own page in GQ every month. That’s some fashion clout.

Waris Ahluwalia on The Sartorialist
Waris Ahluwalia on The Sartorialist

It’s not the first time Waris has been on a fashion blog. He was on Facehunter in 2007, repping fashion designer, Benjamin Cho.

Twitter, the Yankee Racers, and the Wes Anderson Film Festival

The Rushmore Academy now has over 100 followers on Twitter. Follow us!

Because of a recent onslaught of spamming, automatic activation of new accounts on the Yankee Racers forum has been temporarily suspended. In order to activate your account, send an e-mail to edwardappleby @ yankeeracers.org (no spaces).  We encourage you to drop by the forum.

If you are in the Dayton (Ohio) area, be sure to stop by the Dayton Dirt Collective for a screening of Rushmore on Sunday at 6:00 p.m. (details).

BONUS DISC: a Wes-inspired design project.


World of Waris

Very cool video featuring Waris Ahluwalia’s newest jewelry collection, Omnia Vincit Amor (Love Conquers All). More at House of Waris.

A note of clarification

I meant no ill-will to the well-respected musician Will Oldham.

I asked, “and, uh, who is Will Oldham?” in jest because he had made a dismissive comment about Wes Anderson’s “cancerous approach to using music.”

Please suspend your sharp-tongued nastygrams.

Wes Moment No. 002

Bob Maplethorpe, potential get-away driver, go!

Brought to you by the 2009 Wes Anderson Film Festival.

Suggest the next Wes Moment! E-mail edwardappleby @ yankeeracers.org or tweet @rushmoreacademy!

Nearly 100 followers on Twitter…

We started tweeting a month ago and have nearly 100 followers.

FOLLOW US!

Wes Anderson Soundtrack Tribute Night in Northampton, MA

Oh, what’s that Will Oldman? I can’t hear you over the awesomeness…

May 1, 2009
Wes Anderson Soundtrack Night
140 Pleasant Street
Northampton, MA 01060
www.elevensmusic.com
10pm $5

Will Oldham is cranky (and, uh, who is Will Oldham?)

From The Onion A.V. Club:

After giving a memorable performance as a boy preacher in John Sayles’ 1987 coal-mining drama Matewan, Will Oldham made a brief attempt at being a working actor, before becoming disillusioned with Hollywood and retreating into seclusion for several years. When Oldham emerged, he came bearing music. As the reticent, creaky-voiced frontman for the mysterious Palace Brothers (later Palace Music, Palace Songs, and then just Palace), Oldham brought a distinctive new sound to indie-rock, informed by spooky country ballads, Eastern mysticism, and hermetic eccentricity…

AVC: You mentioned talking to Richard Linklater and Caveh Zahedi about your ideas on movie music. Can you summarize those ideas?

WO: Well, for a while, it seemed like you were always seeing movies where all the music was determined by the music supervisors and their special relationships with certain record labels. And I just felt like, “Wow, I’ll bet they spent months or years writing this screenplay, and I’ll bet they spent months shooting this, and I’ll bet they spent months editing this, and now they’re spending no time at all picking these completely inappropriate songs with lyrics to put under a scene that has dialogue.” How does that even work? How can you have a song with someone singing lyrics under spoken dialogue and consider that mood-music, or supportive of the storyline? As somebody who likes music, when that happens, I tend to listen to the lyrics, which have nothing to do with the movie. And then I’m lost in the storyline. Not only is that a crime, but it’s a crime not to give people who are good at making music for movies the work. It’s like saying, “We don’t need you, even though you’re so much better at it than I am as a music supervisor.” Like the cancer that is that Darjeeling guy… what’s his name?

AVC: Wes Anderson?

WO: Yeah. His completely cancerous approach to using music is basically, “Here’s my iPod on shuffle, and here’s my movie.” The two are just thrown together. People are constantly contacting me saying, “I’ve been editing my movie, and I’ve been using your song in the editing process. What would it take to license the song?” And for me it’s like, “Regardless of what you’ve been doing, my song doesn’t belong in your movie.” That’s where the conversation should end. Music should be made for movies, you know?

AVC: So there aren’t many contexts in which you can imagine licensing one of your songs to a movie?

WO: No. I mean, I could see-

AVC: Over the closing credits, maybe?

WO: Right, the closing credits. But again, someone wrote me recently and said, “We wanna use your songs in our movie, and we’ve already got this artist, this artist, this artist, this artist.” And I was thinking, “Well that makes for like, no integrity to your movie. All these different voices combined with the actors’, writer’s, director’s and DP’s voices. That sounds like the worst place to be. That sounds like a music festival.” [Laughs.] I liked it when those crazy, dirty, Rhode Island brothers made movies like There’s Something About Mary.

Derek Hill on neo-neo-realism

Back a few weeks ago, when A.O. Scott and Richard Brody were debating “neo-neo-realism,” I asked our resident film historian Derek Hill to put it in perspective for us. His brief essay follows.

With many of the world’s “first world” economies sputtering and grinding down, the need to curb excesses in one’s life seems understandable if not an outright necessity.   Dream factory Hollywood, not exactly the type of place known for cutting back on indulgences of any kind, continues to roll on with one grandiose, bloated B-movie after another.  And while many of them are no doubt fun and occasionally even great, most of us need a little more substance to balance out all the eye candy.  For the adventurous filmgoer, fans of more character-driven, modestly budgeted fare, there are plenty of wonderfully crafted films—Wendy and Lucy being a notable example—among all of the bullying Hollywood blockbusters.

A few weeks ago, Mr. A.O. Scott from The New York Times spotlighted some films he regards as a part of a Neo-Neo Realist movement, and reminds readers that in times of crisis (we have been down these dark roads many times before) we tend to gravitate toward more escapist films and genres.  But what about those of us who want an “escape from escapism”?   Scott highlights the extraordinary post-World War Two Italian Neorealist films as aesthetic forebears to the newer low-budget indie films like Wendy and Lucy and others, seeing a distinct common thread binding the struggling, determined working class “heroes” of the Italian era with the struggling, determined mostly working class heroes from the current films.

I don’t think Scott is entirely off the mark, but writer Richard Brody, in his rebuttal in The New Yorker, isn’t so convinced and brings up some glaring examples of how Scott’s through line isn’t as sharp as he intends.  Film noir immediately came to mind while I read Scott’s piece (although most noir films are in no way realistic), and Brody does pinpoint that equally extraordinary American post-World War Two genre as having utilized many of the same gritty, naturalistic qualities as the Italians, especially in the pre-Hollywood blacklist era films of Jules Dassin.  Brody also contradicts and clarifies that… oh, I’m just going to let you read it for yourselves.

Personally, I love “realism” and “naturalism” in films when done correctly and many of the films from the Neorealist movement are favourites.  But I don’t see films like Bicycle Thieves as inherently more noble or enriching than a film with a surreal, fantastical, or broadly comedic hyper-realistic approach.  All films are trickery and loaded with varying degrees of manipulation.  All films are seductive, lulling us into belief.

Much to ponder.  I think both critics bring up valuable points.  Any thoughts?

Derek Hill is the author of Charlie Kaufman and Hollywood’s Merry Band of Pranksters, Fabulists and Dreamers: An Excursion Into the American New Wave.